Criminal Government
Eric Holder’s DOJ Sets New Standard for Corruption
07/29/10 By Victor Thorn, American Free Press, 08/02/10 Issue 31
Attorney General Eric Holder should have been imprisoned a decade ago when he illegally withheld evidence from the Department of Justice (DOJ) in order to arrange the presidential pardon of Jewish racketeer Marc Rich. Many attribute this unconscionable act as a favor from Bill Clinton to the Israeli government.
Holder recently made news by filing a lawsuit against Arizona for passing a bill in an attempt to protect its Mexican border from an unceasing infiltration of illegal aliens. During a congressional hearing, Holder admitted to opposing the Arizona bill before ever reading it.
Several weeks ago, Holder’s subordinates dropped a case of racially motivated voter intimidation by the New Black Panther Party after federal prosecutors had already won a default judgment and were awaiting sentencing. Holder’s prejudices prevailed, especially in light of the fact that on Feb. 18, 2009, he called America “a nation of cowards” in regard to racial matters.
Holder has made other controversial decisions. Attorney Orly Taitz, known for investigating whether or not Barack Obama is a natural-born citizen as the Constitution requires for serving presidents, alleges Holder was spotted clandestinely meeting with Judge Clay Land prior to a federal “birther” hearing.
In an Oct. 5, 2009 article at the TPM Muckraker news web site (Talking Points Memo), reporter Justin Elliott quoted part of Taitz’s complaint, noting:
That alleged sighting is “circumstantial evidence suggesting that, in fact Judge Land was influenced by prior association or direct ex parte communications with Attorney General Eric Holder, acting as agent on behalf of de facto President Obama,” Taitz writes in her motion.
Another legal proceeding is also being tainted. Impeached Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich has faced a brick wall in trying to subpoena both Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and President Obama in his corruption trial. Holder’s conflict of interest and direct ties to the Chicago political mob are clear. In March 2004 he accepted $300,000 from “Blago” to defend a casino licensing case. Holder conveniently failed to mention this payoff in his Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire.
Additionally, on May 13, Holder testified against Idaho physicians, asserting that they engaged in illegal price fixing if they refused to accept price controls imposed under “Obamacare,” the national health plan recently signed into law by Obama. Amazingly, the DOJ insisted, “Government prices are market prices.”
SORDID HISTORY
Holder’s current transgressions mirror a checkered past as deputy attorney general under Janet Reno in the Clinton administration. As a federal prosecutor, Holder allowed rogue FBI marksman Lon Horiuchi and his colleagues to escape indictment after murdering Vicki Weaver, who held her baby in her arms, during the Ruby Ridge shootout.
Shortly thereafter, Holder played a prominent role in covering up the egregious crimes committed against at least 74 innocent citizens, many of whom were children, when the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the FBI incinerated the Branch Davidian church near Waco, Texas in a horrible inferno in 1993.
Following the Oklahoma City Bombing in 1995, Kenneth Trentadue was mistakenly jailed as an accomplice in this false-flag attack. More tragically, on Aug. 21, 1995 prison officials purported that Trentadue hanged himself.
However, independent researchers suspect that the man had actually been strangled to death in his prison cell.
Trentadue’s sibling, Jesse, a Salt Lake City attorney, insists Holder acted as the point man in preventing an investigation.
“Mr. Holder’s job was to cover up my brother’s murder—basically to stop all inquiry,” Trentadue has said. “Holder’s job was to stop the Democrats and Republicans from looking into this.”
Protecting violent assailants seems to be Holder’s forte. During the famous abduction case of young Cuban exile Elian Gonzalez, Holder advocated the use of automatic weapons by federal agents who leveled their guns at the head of this six-year-old boy before deporting him to Cuba. Ironically, Holder is a staunch proponent of strict “gun-control” laws, fully supporting Washington, D.C.’s former ban on handguns. It appears the attorney general only wants weapons in the hands of criminals, who naturally disobey gun laws. The agents of our modern police state receive a similar waiver. Only law-abiding civilians are disarmed.
To close his career in Janet Reno’s DOJ, Holder helped pardon two Weather Underground domestic terrorists—Susan Rosenberg and Linda Evans—who were arrested for possession of 740 pounds of dynamite.
Similarly, he assisted in the release of 16 Puerto Rican FALN terrorists who committed 130 bombings in the United States. These criminals are so abhorrent that they blew off one police officer’s leg during a bombing, while thrashing another detective’s face beyond recognition. To facilitate freedom for these killers, Holder concealed evidence from Congress, in addition to overriding opposition from the FBI and Bureau of Prisons.
Even after leaving office and entering the private sector, Holder served as a lobbyist for Global Crossing, a company whose widespread corruption rivaled Enron and swindler Bernard Madoff.
Thus, the record shows Holder is arguably one of the most crooked, debased political figures in recent memory. Whether accepting bribes from dual U.S.-Israeli mobster Marc Rich, or allowing those responsible for the slaughters at Ruby Ridge, Waco and Oklahoma City to escape prosecution, Holder epitomizes the travesties of our legal system, including the right to fair elections. Lady Justice is depicted as being blind to symbolize her impartiality, yet one could say that Holder has desecrated this esteemed symbol.
Murder of Tenn. Official Linked to Grand Jury Corruption?
Events take a scary turn in ex-Navy man’s eligibility lawsuit against President Obama
07/29/10 By Pat Shannan, American Free Press, 08/02/10 Issue 31
The corruption exposed by retired U.S. Navy Lt. Cmdr. Walt Fitzpatrick in Monroe County, Tenn., over the illegal seating of grand jury foreman Gary Pettway may have reached a new low with the murder of a prominent Republican Elections Commission official. On July 17, the charred body of Jim Miller, 60, a well-known businessman and lifelong resident of Sweetwater, was found wrapped in a blanket in the trunk of his Ford Crown Victoria.
According to a Monroe County Sheriff’s Department spokesperson, Miller’s car was discovered “fully engulfed in flames” off Old Highway 68 around 8 p.m. that Saturday by a deputy on patrol. After extinguishing the flames, firefighters from the nearby Christiansburg Fire Department discovered Miller’s remains in the trunk. Officials told AMERICAN FREE PRESS that, although the autopsy had been performed, the results could take as long as six weeks to be released to the public. Two days later, Sheriff Bill Bivens divulged that Miller was killed by an unspecified number of gunshots. A deputy, once a suspect, was officially cleared after three days.
Miller had been working in his Madisonville Elections Commission office on Saturday morning because of early voting and had been missing all afternoon after leaving for home around 12:30 p.m. He apparently had been commandeered in broad daylight in the gangland-style slaying.
“He’d made a call to his wife and was going home, but he never made it home,” fellow commission member James Brown said.
Besides his commission post, Miller has been 1st District chairman of the Republican Party. He was a lifelong Sweetwater resident, president of the Jim Miller Excavating Co., and active in community affairs.
Speculation and rumors are flying in Madisonville, where, only three weeks earlier, Judge Carroll Ross had angrily banned Fitzpatrick from any more research of county records pertaining to the Navy man’s legal challenge on constitutional grounds of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be U.S. president—an effort that has been stymied at every turn by the “locals.”
Supporters of Fitzpatrick say Miller, who had only been in office since April, was definitely an honest man who abhorred corruption and may have been sympathetic to Fitzpatrick’s efforts to force officials to abide by the law. As Elections Commission chairman, Miller likely had the political clout to help right the grand jury’s wrongs, and perhaps influence the proceedings.
On the other hand, some of the citizenry, after hearing news of the murder, immediately jumped to conclusions and voiced accusations toward Fitzpatrick and supportive friend Darren Huff. However, Fitzpatrick was at a picnic with a dozen friends, four of whom actually went past the murder scene on the way home, and Huff was at home in Georgia with a federal monitor around his left ankle.
Huff is the Georgia militia chaplain who was accosted by three branches of law enforcement on his way into Madisonville on April 20. After being detained for 90 minutes, explaining his “Oath Keepers” insignia on his truck doors, and locking his (legal) weapons in his truck’s toolbox, he was allowed to proceed to the courthouse. Ten days later he was indicted on federal charges of “crossing a state line with intent to incite a riot.”
Oath Keepers is an organization that asks both retired and active duty police and military people to pledge never to enforce martial law against their fellow Americans, nor confiscate their firearms, nor fire upon them in the event of civil unrest of any kind.
Huff, who is due in Knoxville court on July 27 for a hearing on the federal charges, has demanded his local sheriff make sure he is accompanied by armed deputies for his trip into Tennessee.
Lieberman Bill Gives President Authority To Silence Internet
In name of national security, any website could be ‘killed’
07/13/10 American Free Press, 07/12/10 Issue 28
New legislation sponsored by Sen. Joe Lieberman (right; D-Conn.) gives Barack Obama the authority to take over the Internet in the event of a “national emergency.” The Orwellian bill is called the Protecting Cyberspace as a National AssetAct (S. 3480), and it will even hand the White House the power to target specific web sites and shut them down for up to four months at a time, no questions asked.
Critics are calling the power a “kill switch” over the Internet. How it would work is that the leading companies that manage content on the web, such as Internet service providers, telecommunications companies, software firms—even power companies—will have to comply with orders from the Department of Homeland Security.
Since the Internet is being used more and more to get around the filters used by the global elitists to control the flow of information, the ability to shut the web down sets a dangerous precedent.
Obama, FTC Plan to Bail Out, Subsidize Lapdog Media
07/13/10 by Victor Thorn, American Free Press, 07/12/10 Issue 28
After passing a $787 billion stimulus package, bailing out banks and insurance companies, taking over segments of the auto industry and passing socialized healthcare legislation, not to mention rumors of nationalizing Big Oil, the government has now set its sights on resuscitating the failed mainstream media.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently released a 47-page draft entitled “Potential Policy Recommendations to Support the Reinvention of Journalism” that recommends less than a direct subsidy of $3.5 billion to failing newspapers such as The New York Times.
In a June 10 editorial for The Washington Times, Mark Tapscott called this move an attempt “to rescue old media being left for dead by formerly paying customers.”
During a June 24 interview, this writer asked Hank Albarelli, author of the book A Terrible Mistake, which documents secret U.S. intelligence experiments during the Cold War, to convey his thoughts on this matter.
“Who even said journalism needs to be reinvented?” asked Albarelli. “Mainstream media is in the death throes, and it can’t survive because they’ve lost so much credibility. People want reliable news, not stories that are twisted, slanted, biased or ignored. Just because The New York Times prints something doesn’t make it true.”
If billions of FTC dollars are at stake, especially considering Obama’s thin-skinned demeanor, it’s fairly certain that funds will be funneled to lapdog media venues and not those pursuing their role as watchdogs.
Albarelli concurred: “The government will play favorites; that’s politics. But let’s be clear: the government can barely run itself. They need to stay away from the press and quit wasting taxpayer money. Plus, I’m sure none of those funds would be going to the alternative media.”
Another aspect of the FTC plan is to establish an AmeriCorps journalism division for students on college campuses. When asked if inclusion of such language reflected a none-too-subtle indoctrination process, Albarelli responded, “It sounds like infiltration. We know from Carl Bernstein’s 1977 Rolling Stone article that the CIA has agents at every newspaper, magazine and television network. William Colby also admitted that the CIA is associated with every serious media outlet in the country.”
He continued, “In a Machiavellian sense, directly paying to train college students could be the government’s way of getting someone on the inside as a future asset. The media would become institutionalized—even more beholden to the government than they already are.”
The FTC report also describes antitrust exemptions that allow news organizations to collude with competitors and collectively set prices.
Albarelli sneered at this notion. “Isn’t the press already monopolized by five or six huge corporations?” he asked. “This legislation would make the situation even worse, with the potential to completely erase any sort of adversarial relationship between media and government. We’re not getting much sincere information from the mainstream media anyway. They’ve completely given up on real investigative reporting.”
Spearheading the FTC’s campaign is self-professed neo-Marxist professor Robert McChesney, founder of a media advocacy group called “Free Press.” McChesney reveals his vision of a totalitarian takeover with the following quotes:
• “Only government can implement policies and subsidies to provide an institutional framework for quality journalism.”
• “There is no real answer but to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles.”
In this regard, if the government defines who reports the news, they’ll ultimately be able to determine what is reported. The First Amendment can’t survive if the federal government intrudes upon and regulates this process. Or, as Albarelli concedes, “Our Constitution will go right out the window.”
Although the FTC used a benign form of rhetoric in its draft, they know there’s a reason why people aren’t buying establishment newspapers any longer. When The New York Times refuses to provide the entire picture, readers invariably resort to more valid sources that aren’t afraid to tackle subjects like 9-11 being an inside job, Israeli terrorism, secretive Bilderberg meetings, and the so-called “Holocaust.”
Stacking the deck with blatant subsidies won’t alter this situation when citizens increasingly keep bypassing the dinosaur media. This glaringly apparent fact leads to the crux of why the old-guard power structure is so concerned, and why it insists on more regulation. As people repeatedly flee from the “old media,” their ability to brainwash, condition, control and propagandize the populace drastically diminishes.
Albarelli doesn’t buy into this Orwellian newspeak. “The government’s plan to reinvent journalism won’t work,” he said. “It’s a boneheaded idea. No matter how much money they throw at this problem, the mainstream media is on its way out. Short of martial law and shutting down the Internet or alternative news sources, the government can’t change the shape of media in the future. People are avoiding them for a reason.”
It’s yet to be seen what will develop, but one thing is certain: If the government does decide to pad the pockets of certain newspapers, their money will undoubtedly go to ringers such as The Washington Post and not legitimate news venues like AMERICAN FREE PRESS.
Senate Democrats Seek to Exploit Oil Spill to Ramrod Climate Bill
07/13/10 American Free Press, 07/12/10 Issue 28
Democrats in the Senate say they will exploit the oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico to ramrod through legislation addressing claims about cataclysmic global warming that objective scientists agree are spurious. According to a recent report in a mainstream New York daily, a summary of a closed-door Senate Democratic caucus meeting, leaked to the press, reveals that Democrats are seeking to use the spill as leverage to force Republican support, essentially saying that failure to vote for a climate change bill that is loaded down with new oil drilling regulations is a vote for Big Oil polluters.
In recent reports, AFP reporter Victor Thorn has been making the case that the internationalists see the disaster as an ideal time to force through new global climate change laws that will be profitable for them. What the Democrats are really going for is something known as “cap and trade.” In a nutshell, this involves bureaucrats setting carbon-emission standards on all U.S. factories. That is the “cap” portion of the plan. The “trade” part comes into play when factories cannot meet the levels set by government regulators.
Those corporations will then have to turn to others, who meet or come in under the emissions standards that have been imposed upon them. The companies that exceed their government-imposed standards will then be able to purchase or trade other companies’ remaining emissions levels so as to raise their own.
A new breed of carbon capitalists on Wall Street are already champing at the bit to create a market for “cap and trade,” whereby corporations will be able to trade emissions levels like they buy and sell commodities or swap stock. Of course, slash-and-burn speculators will also be able to get in on the horse trading, betting on futures and formulating exotic derivatives based on who will and will not be able to meet government imposed levels.
That is grounds enough for voting against cap and trade. However, the bigger problem stems from what the program will do to American business.
Heavy taxation and onerous regulations have already driven many corporations out of the United States in search of cheap or slave labor and limited government, where they can make a profit. Meanwhile, those patriotic companies that have chosen to stay in the United States will face even more complex regulations. In a continuing cycle that further squeezes domestic industry, the costs will be passed down to Main Street, making it even harder for consumers in the United States.
Media Spins Recent Poll on Sept. 11
07/06/10 By Mark Anderson, American Free Press, 07/05/10 Issue 27
Despite the mainstream media’s recent effort to “spin” a spring poll on the Sept. 11
attacks in favor of the government’s theory on what really happened, a leading 9-11 activist contends that the survey is good news.
This Angus Reid poll was announced as “Americans Disagree with Iranian President on 9-11 ‘Fabrication’.”
Activist Kevin Barrett, a former Wisconsin professor, responded that while the poll says two-thirds of Americans support the 9-11 Commission’s conventional theory, the number of those who doubt the official story is actually quite large, as he sees it.
The Canada-based pollsters said; “Two-thirds of respondents stand by the conclusions of the 9-11 Commission, which blamed al-Qaeda for the attacks. The recent suggestion by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that the 9-11 attacks were a ‘fabrication’ is rejected by a large proportion of Americans.”
And when it comes to “conspiracy theories,” the survey “asked respondents [if] things that have been said and written about the events of 9-11 are actually credible. Just 15 percent of respondents think the collapse of the World Trade Center was the result of a controlled demolition, and the same proportion believe that United Airlines Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, was shot down.”
The pollsters summarized: “A majority of Americans are on the same side when it comes to 9-11, stating that the event was not a fabrication, that the conclusions of the 9-11 Commission are correct, and that the conspiracy theories are not credible. While one in four Americans believe 9-11 was a fabrication designed to facilitate the campaign against terrorism, the proportion of respondents who openly reject the conclusions of the 9-11 Commission—and who find the conspiracy theories . . . credible—is far lower.”
Barrett responded: “By framing the issue as one of agreement or disagreement with [the] media-demonized Iranian president . . . and focusing on those who disagreed, Angus Reid Public Opinion was spinning the story as hard as it could. . . . But all the spin in the world can’t hide the fact that these are the biggest MIHOP numbers yet.” MIHOP is an acronym for “made it happen on purpose,” i.e., the government deliberately allowed or caused the 9-11 attacks, with the elusive Osama bin Laden serving as a scapegoat.
“According to the new Angus Reid 9-11 poll, 26 percent of Americans say flat out that 9-11 was ‘a big fabrication,’ while 12 percent more aren’t sure. Splitting the difference with the ‘not-sures,’ we arrive at 32 percent either flat-out believing or leaning toward MIHOP,” Barrett continued. “Taking into consideration . . . the psychological tendency of poll respondents to disguise their real beliefs in order to avoid . . . labels like ‘conspiracy theorist’ or ‘Ahmadinejad supporter,’ we must conclude that the real numbers are considerably higher.”
Obama: The Ultimate Frontman
06/22/10 By Louis Thomas McFadden, American Free Press, 06/14-21/10 Issue 24/25
It seems unfair to write a critical book on Barack Obama: He is such an easy target. Never in the history of the U.S. have we had a president without a reasonable record of his education and personal background, a person who came out of the darkness to join the traditional enemies of America at a young age and was propelled into the highest office of the nation to be the “front man” for the ultimate insiders and manipulators.
Victor Thorn in his latest book, Frontman: Obama’s Darkest Secrets Revealed, systematically explores the shortcomings and insider ties of Obama, to the point of becoming a major thorn in the side of his administration.
The reader learns very fast that the birth certificate issue is the least problem this White House resident has. Thorn explains his major issue on the first page: This president is taking America down the path of self destruction, and it was the naive and the gullible that opted for him after being set up and prepared by eight years of the GeorgeW. Bush administration.
Thorn starts with Obama’s deep links to slumlord and con man Antoin “Tony” Rezko, who pulled every legal and illegal trick in the book to secure funds for Obama since 1990. This relationship lasted all the way to 2008, when Rezko was convicted for bribery and fraud on 16 out of 24 charges.
Next item is the in-depth exposure of Obama’s closest associates who are most saturated with the idea of the radical black political agenda. The connection to Rev. Jeremiah Wright is explored in detail, with his advice that blacks should sing: “God Damn America.” Obama’s closest associates are clearly those who view the present American society primarily as a battleground between blacks and whites. Well-known terrorist of the 1970s William Ayers seems like a moderate in the group with his close association to Obama.
The next pages explore the mysterious dead men—three homosexuals from Obama’s church—who were executed with bullets to the head starting in November 2007, all dying within 40 days, a process that strongly resembles the Clinton years. The suggestive timing of these murders surely carried a message to those who were willing to question who will be the next president in late 2007.
After the closest circle of friends, Thorn explores a wide ring of Obama’s political associates, all with seasoned Trilateral, Bilderberg, Zionist and Federal Reserve associations. Although Rahm Emanuel—with his terrorist family background—is the most visible, Thorn lines up an impressive group of top insiders. Every one of these men and women subscribes to a decidedly anti-American political agenda.
The outlines of a deeply compromised upper class are correctly drawn up by Thorn and are supported by hundreds of facts but over everything else Thorn convicts Obama by his associations and lack of transparency concerning his prior years.
He properly names a true frontman for the most sinister forces any Western nation had ever to encounter inside the gates.
Three Members of Obama’s Church Killed
06/22/10 By Victor Thorn, American Free Press, 06/02/08 Issue 22
Investigator close to case believes there’s more to the brutal murders than mainstream press is letting on
Is a Barack Obama bombshell lurking in the shadows, waiting to derail one of the biggest Cinderella stories in recent history?
While most political prognosticators in the mainstream press presume that Obama is the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, they still wonder aloud if Hillary Clinton (or some other entity) has something up their sleeve.
The bombshell may involve the murder of Donald Young, a 47-year-old choir master at former Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ—the same congregation that Obama has attended for the past 20 years. Two other young black men that attended the same church—Larry Bland and Nate Spencer—were also murdered execution style with bullets to the backs of their heads—all within 40 days of each other, beginning in November 2007. All three were openly homosexual.
What links this story to Barack Obama is that, according to an acquaintance of Obama, Larry Sinclair, Obama is a closet bisexual with whom he had sexual and drug-related encounters in November 1999.
Further, Sinclair claims that Obama was friendly with at least two of these deceased parishioners, and that choir director Donald had contacted him shortly before being murdered from multiple gunshot wounds on December 23, 2007.
These killings are receiving a number of different reactions. Mike Parker, reporting for CBS in Chicago, wrote, “Activists fear gay African-Americans are being targeted for murder,” while Marc Loveless of the Coalition for Justice and Respect queries, “Are we under attack? Is this a serial killer?”
An even more sinister aspect of this case is being investigated. According to Sinclair in an affidavit to the Chicago Police Department, Donald Young had informed him that he and Barack Obama were “intimate” with each other. Sinclair, it should be noted, declared on a January 18, 2008, YouTube video that on two separate occasions in November 1999, he engaged in sexual acts with Obama, and that Obama smoked crack cocaine—once in a limousine and the other time at a hotel in Gurnee, Ill.
Sinclair has also asked: why would Young—whom he had never met—initiate these calls by contacting him on cell phone numbers known only in the Obama camp? Further, a private investigator connected to the Chicago Police Department told the Globe, “Donald Young was silenced because of something he knew about Obama. Donald was in a position where he heard a lot of things and saw a lot of things concerning Barack.”
Another questionable Obama associate is openly homosexual. That person is Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig, who was listed during the 2008 campaign as being part of Obama’s “technology initiative.”
In April, Lessig showed a video at a Google seminar entitled Jesus Christ: The Musical where “Jesus Christ lip-syncs Gloria Gaynor’s late 1970s disco hit I Will Survive during which he strips down to just a diaper, effeminately struts along a city street, and finally gets run over by a speeding bus.”
Are three murders within the span of 40 days among members of America’s most discussed church—one run by the controversial Rev. Jeremiah Wright—enough to arouse the suspicions of Chicago law enforcement officials and members of the national media?
Or, as Sinclair wrote in a May 18 email, was the murder of Young “made to look similar to other recent murders as to make it look as if it were a hate crime” because he had become a political liability?
One can only hope that this isn’t the beginning of another body count eerily reminiscent of that associated with Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Has Sen. Lindsey Graham been Compromised?
05/29/10 Victor Thorn, American Free Press, 05/17/10 Issue 20
Is Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) being blackmailed due to his sexual orientation? This whispering campaign is the latest to circulate around Washington, D.C. But does it hold any validity, or should citizens dismiss these allegations as a political stunt or the fodder of cheap tabloids?
Before arriving at any definitive conclusions, consider the facts. Graham hails from one of the most conservative states in our union, with the seat he now holds previously being occupied by ultra-traditionalist Strom Thurmond. Yet despite the wishes of his constituents, Graham is frequently referred to as a “Democrat in drag.” In this regard, his critics certainly have plenty of ammunition. For starters, he and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) have long acted as the primary Republicans in support of a pro-amnesty immigration bill for illegal aliens. In fact, an April 25 article by David Dayen reads, “Graham just last month challenged the president to write the immigration bill and get co-sponsors.” To push forward this agenda, he worked closely with liberal Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y).
Equally as egregious, Graham joined forces with Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) in an attempt to ramrod the horrendous cap-and-trade legislation through Congress. If passed, analysts argued that taxes and gas prices would skyrocket, while increased business costs would place American companies at an even bigger disadvantage in relation to foreign competitors.
As a Christian Zionist, Graham unabashedly fills the role of lapdog to McCain. AFP correspondent Michael Collins Piper’s articles exposing McCain’s ties to organized crime in Arizona are second to none.
In addition, at a March 22AIPAC policy conference, Graham boasted, “Israel is our best friend in the world.”
Also, like McCain, Graham’s status as a Zionist warmonger cannot be denied, especially when declaring, “Any [American] attack on Iran must be full scale.”
If that’s not enough, Graham exhibits a particular distaste for the tea party movement, has publicly denigrated Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and his supporters, and labeled those who question the legality of Barack Obama’s birth certificates a “fringe group of conspiracy theorists.” He also fed fake claims that tea party “members” hurled racial epitaphs at a black congressman; then called Obama “a good role model” on NBC’s Meet the Press.
A pro-UN global warming organization, the American Values Network, also sidled up to Graham by paying for an advertising campaign in South Carolina. Two of their main advocates are a former Democratic Party chairman and a woman who championed Obama’s socialized healthcare bill.
Finally, Graham favors a national ID program, complete with biometric data cards, voted for corporate bailouts, is open to nationalizing U.S. banks, and told the Mexican racist group La Raza, “America is more of an idea than a place.”
With this preponderance of evidence at hand, who is Graham serving: the citizens of this nation or a cabal of Zionist globalists?
When pondering this question, we can’t help but return to the subject of blackmail.
The anti-amnesty, anti-illegal immigration organization Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) posted this observation on April 21: “There are many precedents in American politics where affairs, corruption, addictions and other situations that politicians wanted concealed were used to manipulate them.”
ALIPAC President William Gheen upped the ante at an April 17 tea party in Greenville, S.C.
“U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham is gay, and while many people in South Carolina and Washington, D.C. know that, the general public and Graham’s constituents do not,” said Gheen. “His desire to keep this a secret may explain why he is doing a lot of political dirty work for others who have the power to reveal his secrets. Sen. Graham needs to come out of the closet inside that log cabin so the public can rest assured he is not being manipulated with his secret.”
Gheen was referring to the Log Cabin Republicans, an openly homosexual pro-GOP organization.
Gheen’s disclosure provides an insight into Graham’s curious behavior.
“When you have a U.S. senator from such a conservative state like South Carolina working hand in hand with Obama and New York liberals like Sen. Chuck Schumer to pass an amnesty bill for illegal aliens, there is something very wrong,” said Gheen.
Although Washington, D.C. has attempted to conceal a sordid history of homosexual-related political scandals—Barney Frank, Larry Craig, Mark Foley—Gheen took one final jab which merits consideration.
“Barney Frank has more integrity and bravery than Sen. Lindsey Graham right now,” said Gheen. “When you are a U.S. senator, the public deserves to know what might influence your decisions. Obama and Napolitano know about Sen. Graham. Now it is time for the rest of the country to know.”
Rogue Jurists Wage War Against Liberty and Truth
05/19/10 CFP Staff
The Federal Courthouse in Pensacola has been a fountainhead of evil and subversive activity in recent years. Beyond the fact that its mere presence at the corner of Palafox and Garden Streets is an affront to Constitutional liberty…the Federal Courthouse has been the specific scene of a variety of miscarriages of justice. Two such shameful events involved the sham trials and railroading into prison of patriotic heroes and martyrs Dr. Kent Hovind and Dr. Ward Dean. (For more information regarding the plight of these two stalwart defenders of the Constitution, the reader is advised to go to www.threepillarsoftyranny.com/honor.html). Hovind and Dean were both persecuted and prosecuted by a criminal judiciary that routinely tramples on Constitutional liberty in its ongoing illicit domination of the American people as a whole. In order to maintain its illegitimate power, the Federal judiciary flagrantly violates its own rules of procedure found in Title 18 of the United States Code. Federal prosecutors and judges are all engaged in a massive criminal racket whereby they prey upon the ignorance, fear, and naivete of the citizenry who are cajoled and browbeaten into rendering “guilty” verdicts against their hapless, targeted fellow Americans.
Two judges in particular have made their indelible and infamous mark upon the annals of injustice in this locality. Judges Lacey Collier and Casey Rodgers played major roles in illicitly denying defendants Hovind and Dean their Constitutionally guaranteed due process of law. In concert with the jackal like prosecutors who marshaled the government’s bogus, trumped up cases against Hovind and Dean, these two rogue jurists did all within their unscrupulous power to prevent the truth from seeing the light of day in their respective courtrooms. Upon manipulating a pliable jury to the desired guilty verdict, Collier and Rodgers proceeded to mete out insanely draconian sentences, thus compounding the severity of their crimes of abuse, misconduct and malfeasance.
Of even greater severity, however, have been the rulings of Judge Casey Rodgers in the case involving the issues of prayer and Christian expression in the school system of Santa Rosa County, Florida. With guidance by the ACLU, two unknown plaintiffs brought suit alleging a violation of their rights by virtue of the open expression of Christian and Biblical truth and practice in Santa Rosa’s schools. This inane line of legal argumentation has become all too familiar in our nation as the organized anti-Christ forces of atheistic humanism have carried out deadly warfare against the noble Christian heritage and character of the American nation our forefathers established. Pathetically…Americans of all backgrounds have been intimidated into docile silence by a tyrannical Federal government that continuously champions evil while brazenly asserting the lie that its actions somehow reflect the original intent of the framers of the Constitution.
Although it is obvious that the hireling prosecutors and judges are merely following the orders and dictates that emanate from on high, it is nevertheless undeniable that they are fully complicit and cooperative in the gradual yet systematic destruction of the Christian foundation upon which our nation was established. (Visit www.wallbuilders.com.) Serious students of both Scripture and the history of Revolutionary America understand that our federal taskmasters are fully intent upon the complete imposition of their iron fisted tyrannical will. For this reason it is also understood that the time has arrived for imprecatory prayer for divine deliverance from the wicked oppressors among us.
Crusade Against Criminal Government and Media Accomplices Continues
05/18/10 CFP Staff
Since making his announcement speech on April 15th across from the Federal Courthouse in downtown Pensacola, newly declared U.S. Senate candidate Rick Tyler has been devoting time and attention to the monumental challenges of penetrating the iron curtain of censorship that is designed to perpetuate the monopoly of the two party political system. Notably, Tyler has been blatantly blacked out in the local Pensacola press. When questioned as to this irresponsible and unprofessional treatment by the media, Tyler laughingly responds that such conduct is to be fully expected and that it is, in fact, precisely what he anticipated. In Tyler’s words, “The Pensacola News Journal sets the censorship standard that knowledgeable Americans have come to expect from the arrogant and condescending parties that dominate our nation and society today. They and their counterparts in broadcast media are in no way interested in the advancement of individual liberty and local autonomy from oppressive, big government but, instead, are shills for the internationalists who are systematically destroying what little remains of our once great Republic.”
Tyler fully understands that his crusade against criminal government and all its unscrupulous allies in the private sector is the epitome of a David vs. Goliath struggle. Tyler is quick, however, to remind everyone of the outcome of that dramatic historical event. In all his bluster and bravado, Goliath, bent on reviling and blaspheming the Holy God of Scripture, was no match for the unflinching courage and righteous indignation of one determined to resist the evil giant.
In keeping with David’s example, Rick Tyler expresses an unwavering determination to invoke divine judgment and retribution against the Goliath-like forces of our present hour of history. Tyler reminds all who will listen that Scripture informs us that “with God all things are possible.”
Who are the Feds?
06/24/08
Who are these individuals who occupy powerful positions within the Federal governing apparatus? What common character traits do they exhibit and how were they able to secure appointments to these influential offices? Remember, these are people who exert tremendous power and influence over the lives and actions of average citizens throughout the nation, and yet, we know so little about them.
Occasionally, publicity regarding one of our Federal task masters will erupt into the news such as in the case of the late Assistant U.S. Attorney J.D. Roy Atchison. If you recall, he was the sordid character who disembarked from a flight in Michigan thinking he was on his way to indulge in a perverse encounter with a five year old girl. To his shock and amazement, he had become ensnared in a sting operation being conducted over the Internet by law enforcement officers operating under the auspices of the McComb County, Michigan sheriff’s department.
Mr. Atchison was publicly disgraced and humiliated and reportedly committed suicide in his jail cell shortly after his arrest. Preliminary disclosures by the media indicated that Atchison had been carrying out clandestine behavior of such warped proportions for some time. In his e-mail communication with the officer posing as the mother of the would be victim, Atchison assured her that because of his extensive experience in matters of this nature, there would be no danger of injury and the subsequent need for medical attention.
It is interesting to note that Mr. Atchison had been a prominent figure with the office of the U.S. Attorney in Florida’s panhandle for close to two decades. He had close ties to such local officials as the chief of the Gulf Breeze Police Department and was well thought of by a community that failed to look past the surface image of a man occupying his prestigious position. This man oversaw the asset forfeiture arm of the immensely powerful federal governing structure in the region, all the while apparently leading a depraved dual existence of the sickest brand of perversion. The public had no idea what kind of individual was ruling over them and would still be ignorant of such matters were it not for the flukish circumstances under which Atchison was apprehended and charged.
This astonishing story causes all thinking persons to wonder about the other officials who sit in federal office above the citizenry. Even though the government is supposed to be the servant of the people, most Americans will grudgingly acknowledge that such is far from being the case. Instead, these officials and their respective agencies rule over us with an iron fist and callous disregard for individual freedom and liberty. When the likes of Judge Lacey Collier piously intones his judgments over his hapless targets who have often been singled out for selective politically motivated prosecutions, should the citizenry be wondering about what kind of man is sitting in judgment of them? Do we really know the true individual behind the carefully guarded public image sitting in the lofty, condescending perch of the Federal bench?
Do we know the mechanisms whereby other judges and officials have managed to secure their own appointments to powerful positions? Do we have any realistic idea as to the fleshly appetites and orientations of other prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney’s office that Mr. Atchison served in?
It is interesting to contemplate that merely asking these questions could become grounds for heavy-handed retaliation by power wielding federal officials who would want to stifle meaningful investigation into their true profiles, backgrounds, and activities. Such a reality, in and of itself stands as evidence that we are living in something significantly dissimilar to a genuine free country.