By Rick Tyler – February 20, 2012

With the roller coaster political fortunes of Republican Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich prominent in the news, there has been a corresponding uptick in exposure for the chief surrogate of the former House Speaker, a man who happens to have been named after me. (I was born in 1957 and he in 1965…thus his naming occurred after mine.)

Over the years Gingrich’s Rick Tyler has functioned as a spokesman, advocate, and arch defender of the former Georgia Congressman. He has been a frequent guest on T.V. and radio as a tireless and energetic proponent of the ongoing agenda and goals of his mentor and boss. Gingrich, of course, is anything but what he styles and presents himself as on the campaign trail. Instead of the traditional conservative defender of the Constitution that he claims to be, Gingrich is, in reality, a futurist proponent of a post-Constitutional America that will merge comfortably into the steadily evolving new world order. Rick Tyler, quite naturally, contends ultimately for the same long range vision as Gingrich, hollow rhetoric to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Summer Shake Up

In June 2011, the Gingrich campaign made headlines when Rick Tyler and assorted other key operatives abruptly resigned en mass. The ostensible reason for their jumping ship was that Newt had elected to go on vacation when he should have been hard at work on the campaign trail. At the time, the exodus of Tyler and company seemed to cast a foreboding shadow on the former House Speaker’s prospects for success. Now, however, there appears to be an altogether different explanation of what prompted those strange events. Many seasoned observers have now conjectured that the departure of Rick Tyler from the formal campaign was designed to free him up for the crucial role of guiding the strategy and activities of the independent PAC (political action committee) that would raise and spend vast sums of money to advance the cause and fortunes of the Gingrich effort to secure the Republican nomination. A side benefit would also be derived from the perception of having risen from the ashes to become a top contender for the nomination.

In the final analysis, Rick Tyler and his boss Newt Gingrich are complete traitors to the Constitution as well as the foundational beliefs and convictions of our founding fathers. Conservative media personality Glen Beck is accurate in describing Gingrich as nothing more than a progressive. The same conclusion by logical extension must be reached regarding Rick Tyler. As the true Christian Constitutionist I hereby denounce Gingrich’s Rick Tyler as an imposter and would caution the reader to accept no counterfeit substitutes for the genuine article.

{ 0 comments }

By Rex Adams – February 18, 2012

The recent caucus voting in Maine has forced the subject of vote fraud into the news. Specifically, the ongoing campaign to subvert the candidacy of Ron Paul is the issue at the core of this current story. The Texas congressman stands head and shoulders over all other political figures in our present era. He is the individual who supposedly can’t exist in an age when sell out, compromise, and corruption are utterly common place. Simply stated, Ron Paul both speaks and lives the truth. He is not plagued with double mindedness and refuses to rationalize the supposed necessity of violating the Constitution in the purported interest of supporting it. Of course, the remainder of the political world daily engages in such contradictory and truncated logic as they vehemently defend a broad range of unconstitutional government activity and intervention both domestically and throughout the world.

It has become quite obvious that the power structure recently tried to prevent a Ron Paul victory in Maine. Certain obvious actions were taken to, at the very least, prevent Ron Paul from enjoying an outright caucus victory. The overt disenfranchising of a significant number of voters was accomplished by postponing the vote in one county and “accidentally” omitting vote totals from other scattered localities. This, and other nefarious antics by those in positions of power and influence, have served thus far to steal the logical and deserved front runner status from Paul. The illicit tactics employed against Ron Paul include but are not limited to the following:

1. Always referring to him as the “Libertarian Texas congressman.” Such labeling is designed to repel and alienate a significant percentage of the electorate who are subject and susceptible to basic psychology and the accompanying aversion to all things unfamiliar.
2. Incessantly repeating the mantra that Ron Paul is “un-electable” and that he has no actual intentions of winning the nomination or becoming president. These audacious lies have been reiterated so many times as to have become an involuntary recitation by the hireling teleprompter reader or commentator ostensibly dispensing the news.
3. Ad hominem name calling in the form of referring to Paul and his supporters as kooks, looneys, conspiracy nuts, isolationists, wackos, etc. ad nauseum. Such name calling, of course, comes straight from the play book of the totalitarian, statist agenda.
4. The routine omission and censoring of all news favorable to Ron Paul and suggestive of his potential to emerge victorious in the Republican nominating process. This duplicity is at times subtle, but equally as often it assumes a flagrant and unmistakable form.
5. Although this final example is yet unproven by empirical evidence, statistical and observational analysis in the states leading up to Maine suggest that Ron Paul has been the victim of outright vote fraud in the form of sophisticated tampering with the technologically advanced mechanisms through which vote tabulation is achieved. This type of vote fraud has long been an intermittent phenomenon throughout America and has been well documented as long ago as 1992 in the book, Votescam: The Stealing of America by the Collier brothers.

Suffice it to say, any and all who are complicit in the ongoing effort to immorally and criminally sabotage and subvert Ron Raul’s political aspirations are representative of the worst and most egregious conduct in American politics. Such parties are in no way deserving of being considered true conservatives, Constitutionists, Christians, or patriotic, freedom loving Americans.

{ 0 comments }

By Rex Adams – February 15, 2012

Presidential politics has become one of the most dominant spectacles in our contemporary culture. The spectacle is never ending and, though the plot is relatively consistent, the viewing public is treated to a continually evolving cast of characters who, collectively and to varying degrees, form an interesting and often entertaining brand of modern political theater.

The plot, of course, is relatively simple. Every four years a presidential election is held to determine who will either become or remain the so called “leader of the free world.” In reality, the president is more of a figurehead and a symbol than an actual architect of policy and maker of decisions that really matter. Shadowy, behind the scenes forces and personages who operate the levers of global financial control constitute the actual “power behind the throne.” The average American, unfortunately, doesn’t comprehend the aforestated reality and, instead, clings to the childish notion that the president is precisely as portrayed by the major media and institutions that are so dominant in our society. That same individual is not prepared or willing to engage in the considerable degree of independent thought and research that are required in order to understand the nuances and sophisticated machinations through which ongoing power is exercised by the unofficial governing oligarchy. (It is most notable and encouraging that a rapidly growing percentage of the body politic is beginning to awaken to the realities of which we are speaking. Though the percentage remains comparatively small, this increasing number of informed citizens constitutes a very real threat to the corrupt status quo.)

When a presidential election occurs one of the contenders is often the incumbent or sitting president. A two party monopoly has long prevailed in order to ensure that no “unapproved” aspirant to the presidency is able to be perceived as viable. Occasionally, such as in 1992, a supposed independent candidate such as Ross Perot will emerge on the scene as a seeming potential alternative to the status quo. (In reality, Mr. Perot was a mere stooge who was trotted out by that same shadowy power structure to harness the growing wave of discontent emanating from all quarters of the political world, and to ensure that no meaningful change or reform would occur.)

In the typical presidential election the incumbent will seek to defend the record of his first term while a gaggle of potential nominees vie to become the standard bearer of the opposing party. Such aspirants might embark meaningfully upon their quest as early as midway through the current four year term. In some cases a perennial candidate seemingly never breaks stride…continuing to build his organization of supporters and workers…especially in the early voting states such as Iowa and New Hampshire.

As the political primary season revs up, various of the contenders wind up dropping out due to either a lack of interest in their candidacy or, in some cases, the emergence of scandalous information concerning past questionable behavior. As the months unfold leading up to the November election, a consensus is gradually achieved as to who each opposing party will feature as their candidate and nominee. On occasion, the grand masters of political intrigue will allow for a protracted slugfest that will run all the way up to the party’s nominating convention. Traditional wisdom considers such an occurrence to be a debilitating development since it inevitably spawns ongoing infighting and animosity within the overall party structure at a time when everyone, in theory, should be closing ranks against the “real enemy” who is, of course, the candidate being offered up by the opposing party.

In the final analysis it is always two establishment hacks pitted against each other in the general election. The stacked deck nature of the system and process guarantees that none who are genuinely qualified will be allowed to ascend to the perceived pinnacle of political power.

And now…to zero in on the actual focal point of this article…precisely who is in reality genuinely qualified to be president? Obviously, one must meet the Constitutional requirements for eligibility (which the sitting so-called president doesn’t). Beyond such considerations, however, a truly qualified candidate for the American presidency would need to possess the following attributes:

1.   To be in possession of a notable level of intelligence, wisdom, and common sense.
2.   To be free of the encumbrance of having sold out and prostituted himself to mammon.
3.   To fear God instead of man and to be willing to act and govern in accordance with the word and law of God as set forth in the holy scriptures.
4.   To possess a fluid working knowledge of the history, the machinations, and the ongoing agenda of those treasonous satanic conspiratorial forces that are tirelessly and relentlessly orchestrating America’s immersion and absorption in and by a rapidly evolving new world order global superstate.

Suffice it to say that, in modern times, we are yet to witness the emergence of such a qualified candidate.

{ 0 comments }

By Rex Adams – December 23, 2011

During the course of the race for the Republican presidential nomination we have witnessed a series of implosions within the campaigns of the various front runners. First it was Michele Bachman who very briefly rode the crest of the wave coming out of her narrow margin of victory in the Ames, Iowa straw poll. Next, Texas Governor Rick Perry briefly enjoyed front runner status until his substandard debate performances caused him to falter. The rise of Herman Cain followed his decisive victory in the Florida straw poll. It wasn’t long, however, before the revelation of his history of sexual pecadillos brought the black former CEO of Godfather’s Pizza tumbling down from his lofty but short-lived perch. And now…it’s Newt Gingrich who has moved to the head of the pack as the supposed conservative alternative to Mitt Romney. In the estimation of his proponents Gingrich has sufficient intellect as well as the pragmatic capabilities to rival the power of Obama’s incumbency coupled with the erroneous perception that he is of notable cerebral giftedness. In reality, Gingrich is the consumate insider who, according to the highly influential Glen Beck, is nothing more that a progressive…almost indistinguishable from Barak Obama. Additionally, Gingrich has the serious baggage of his history of extramarital affairs as well as his lavishly compensated influence peddling activities on behalf of the likes of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Indeed…it would seem to only be a matter of time before Gingrich’s pronounced warts and blemishes become impossible to ignore and overlook. Don Imus may have been somewhat blunt and excessive in describing Gingrich as a disgusting pig…but his opinion probably isn’t too far beyond the sentiments of a great many Americans…including many of those those who classify themselves as Republicans.

When the seemingly inevitable downfall of Newt occurs only one individual will remain viable as an alternative to Romney and that would be none other than Ron Paul, the man who should have been the shoo-in for the nomination to begin with! Indeed, the integrity laden Paul appears to be poised to win the upcoming Iowa caucus and if such a development occurs we could be in for some exceedingly fascinating developments. For starters, the canard that he is “unelectable” will begin to unravel as his potentially unstoppable momentum rapidly increases. At some point, the journalistic thugs and propaganda point men of the republicrat globalist military industrial combine will begin to look precisely like the dastardly wretches they are…and their continued relentless assault upon a man so vastly their intellectual and moral superior will begin to overtly backfire in their faces. When all the dust settles upon this unfolding political drama Ron Paul may well be the last man standing!

**Special Update** As predicted in this article, the political fortunes of Newt Gingrich have largely dissipated and now Rick Santorum has been catapulted into the limelight. Like all the others, the former Pennsylvania senator has notable baggage and potential weaknesses. He too, in short order, should fizzle thus clearing the path for a timely surge to the forefront of Ron Paul as the only viable and logical alternative to the utterly unacceptable Mitt Romney. Stay tuned for additional developments.

{ 0 comments }